| |
|
On
June 3rd 1968, Valerie Solanas shot Andy Warhol with three bullets painted
silver to match the décor of the Factory. After trying to shoot the impresario
and the art critic who were with her primary target, she fled using the
Factory elevator, almost immediately turned herself in to the police,
and pleaded guilty at her trial. As a result of his wounds, Warhol was
forced to wear a corset - ironically a fashion accessory decried by feminists
- for the rest of his life. He refused however to testify against Solanas,
who spent three years in prison, began to harass Warhol again, was again
arrested, and then spent time in several psychiatric hospitals before
finishing out her days in California exactly as she had begun: prostituting
herself to support her heroin habit.
This
story brings together all the elements of a folktale of the hipster era,
and it ends like one in the middle of the 80's: decline and fall for one
of the protagonists, and long-term trauma for the other. It is also rife
with some of the constitutive elements of the décor which Virginia Barré
has created for her work: pop, feminism, attempted murder, real fake bullets,
vampire blood (Solanas' nickname for Warhol), public fright and media
shockwaves. But it is foremost the tragic farce aspect of the affair,
its deranged equilibrium between regressive childishness and symbolic
ultra-violence, which best synthesizes the artist's procedures and their
underlying obsessions.
If the generation of feminist and appropriationist artists of the 80's
was the contrarian heir of the pop and conceptual art of the preceding
decade, then Virginie Barré is an heiress of appropriationism, which she
extends rather than contests in the manner of many artists of her generation,
for whom it is less a question of distancing themselves from their predecessors
than replaying former conceptual strategies in an almost utilitarian manner.
This questioning, which consists of appropriating the intellectual mechanisms
of appropriation, leads Barré less to a standard critique of originality
than to a revelatory process which goes against the identity of the artist.
Employing a profusion of more or less persistent found images, known persons
and told stories, Virginie Barré negotiates first of all with her own
unconscious as a spectator and with the intimate and unmentionable chaos
of contemporary memory which brings together Claude Cahun and Agatha Christie,
Fantômette and Virginia Woolf, Daria and Simone de Beauvoir. The systematic
outcome of the scenes she orchestrates - violent death - glaringly reveals
a personal obsession, albeit a rather widely shared one. This constant
inverts - with a dose of humor - the principle of the "death of the author".
Virginie Barré: "Author of Death", which she has made the recurring motif
of her work, reveals a little more of her intimate identity with each
homicidal opus, while these sinisterly democratic subjects progressively
build the conditions for a wider audience. She produces a body of work
like an obsessive soap-opera writer who does not work with an eye to the
end or the completion of a series, but rather to its dogged recurrence.
"Only fragments are possible…To put it clearly, the standards which apply
here are different from those of "high culture". A work is good not because
it is complete and finished, but because another type of truth regarding
human nature, another experience of what is human - in sum, another valid
and credible sensibility - is revealed."
This death-dealing subject and its inoculation techniques plead in favor
of the radical accessibility of Virginie Barré's art. But so do its borrowed
sub-cultural media, the arrogant poverty of its materials and accessories,
and the swank baseness of the aesthetic upon which it relies. Rather than
using a refined and facetious language, deftly reversing the clichés of
popular culture and art history in the safe and hermetic field of artsy
subversion, this art firmly demands its share of regression.
|
|
|